Not Even Close (no credit)
- Is not even four full sentences
- Does not coherently answer the question or address the blog topic
- Almost totally lacking in either fact or opinion
- Looks like an AIM message, not formal school writing, errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling
- Does not make a connection
Solid Blog Contribution(7/10 points)
- Is at least four full sentences
- Addresses the blog topic thoughtfully and coherently (the comment makes sense and can be followed)
- Some fact and some opinion but lacking a bit in one or the other
- Is written formally, with correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage, with only one or two errors
- Attempts to make a connection by identifying a person, place, or situation that could inform the blog topic, but does not explain the relationship
Very Strong Blog Contribution(10/10 points)
- Is at least eight sentences long
- Addresses the blog topic very thoughtfully and coherently
- Uses an appropriate amount and balance of facts and opinion (evidence and insight)
- Is written formally with correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage, with no errors
- Makes a connection by identifying a person, place, or situation that could inform the blog topic and explains the relationship; may compare or contrast the two
Then, with the rubric in mind, answer the following question: should a child ever have the right to divorce a parent? In other words, should a child ever be able to choose to legally separate from one or both of his or her parents?
A child should have the right to to divorce a parent because if a parent is abusing a child and no one is doing any thing to help him or her I think that they should have the right to leave them for there own safty. This realates to class like the colonist are the kids and the English are the adults, and when the kids are threated unfarely and they rebel.
ReplyDeleteA child should have the right to " devorce" a parent but there should be a required age to be able to make the decision such as 12 or 13 this is due to a child having more maturity at this age to make adult decisions like this. If a child is too young and decides to "devorce" a parent they may regret their decision because they made it for a wrong reason. But it is scientifically proven that children mature more around the age of 12 so that should be when children acquire the right to devorece a parent for things such as abuse because it threatens safety.
ReplyDeleteA child should be allowed to "divorce" a parent. Sometimes parents abuse children. Also if a family cant afford a child that child wont have the stuff he needs to live. I think that if a child wants to leave he should tell his parents and not just run away. I agree with amber on how they should be a certain age like 12 or 13 in order to leave. Also the child should know where he is going when he leaves.
ReplyDeleteI think children should not be able to divorce thier parents beacuse they will regret it a child will always love thier parents maybe not when their mad but I can connect to this beacause i get mad at my mom some times and I want to leave my house but I think to my self I will always love them so dont leave kids are ment to be with their parents not some where else kids love thier parent if you divorce you will regret it I garentee it.and this is why kids shuld not leave thier parents
ReplyDeleteA Child should have the right to Divorce their parents, because If in the right situation a child should be able to be away from their parents with the help of the law. If the child is being abused, neglected, not fed, or taunted, the child should be able to leave the family position. But not because they argue with you or might happen to call you a name. It would have to be under the circumstances the law provides along with maybe child services. So I agree that a child has the right to divorce there parents under the right reasons and is an appropriate divorce.
ReplyDeleteSould a child ever have the right to divorce a parent? How could you say no? We are all born with natural rights. If at any time we feel neglected, abused, or unloved,we need to divorce our guardian(s). I'm not talking about your dad not giving you the one present you asked for. Even though that's a bummer, it's not a valid reason to divorce a parent! You need to feel like a parent isn't paying attention to what you need to thrive or is making you sleep outside in the winter. That's when you do something about it-and you SHOULD.
ReplyDeleteI think that we should be able to divorce a parent because if you are being abused or threatened in any case then yes you should be able to divorce your parents. If its a minor threat then I think no you should not be able to divorce your parents. One main reason this may not be a good idea would be that you never could make a resolution to become a better family. You never had a second chance. One good reason to leave would to be independent and learn that you really won't survive in the world without your parents helping you grow up.
ReplyDeleteI do not think you should be able to divorce a parent. I see that some people think if the child was being abused but, it is the job of some people to find out if kids need to be put in an orphanage or moved to a new home. Also the kid could report being abused to someone and that would get them to a safer family. If a child wants to divorce where would he/she go? There would be so many kids that are either faking being abused or just coming up with reasons to leave there would be so many kids on the street. Kids need parents or guardians to learn things in life, kids will be missing so many things if they don’t have someone to guide them in life. I can see why kids should be able to report being abused and going to another house but, when it is their choice to divorce and leave to nothing it is a bad idea. Children should not be able to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeletei think that you shouldnt be able to divorce youre parents.just because you have a issue with youre dad or mom. you're going to have to deal with it.there youre parents and there is nothing that is going to change that,even if you do divorce them. so i dont think you should be able to devorce youre parents.
ReplyDeleteIn all seriousness, a child should be able "divorce" from his/her parents. However, it must have a legitimate reason. Saying something like "My mom won't buy me the new Modern Warfare 3 Limited Edition" isn't going to cut it. On the other hand, if the kid has a serious reason for wanting to leave should certainly be able to do so. Some legit reasons include, but are not limited to: abuse, neglect, free labor, etc. That is why some kids should be able to leave their parents. SHAMPOW!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteA child should have the right to divorce their parent(s). They should only be able to divorce their parent(s) if they are being abused or threatening by them. If the situation is little then the jury or lawyers have the choice to choose what happens. This relates to class because in class we read about how the kids are slaves and they do have “natural rights” but the parents or owner don’t actually let them have those “natural rights”. For example, back when the people in New England were poor, they couldn’t afford to feed the whole family. In that circumstance the child has the right to divorce that parent(s) because he/she is not being treated right. I think that no child should have to go through this but if for some reason a child has to divorce their parents, that parent(s) must have had / have been treating them badly. I agree with Amber on how they should be a certain age, like 12 or 13, in order to leave and / or divorce their parents. That’s why I think that a child / children should have the right to divorce their parents(s).
ReplyDeleteA child should have the right to divorce their parent(s). They should only be able to divorce their parent (s) if they are being abused or threatening by them. If the situation is little then the jury or lawyers have the choice. This relates to class because in class we read about how the kids are slaves and they do have “natural rights” but the parents or owner don’t actually let them have those “natural rights”. For example, back when the people in New England were poor, they couldn’t afford to feed the whole family. In that circumstance the child has the right to divorce that parent(s) because he/she is not being treated right. I think that no child should have to go through this but if for some reason a child has to divorce their parents, that parent(s) must have had / have been treating them badly. I agree with Amber on how they should be a certain age, like 12 or 13, in order to leave and / or divorce their parents. That’s why I think that a child / children should have the right to divorce their parents(s).
ReplyDeleteIn all seriousness, kids should be allowed to leave their parents. However they must have a LEGIT reason for it. Saying "My mom won't buy me the new Modern Warfare 3 Limited Edition!" isn't going to cut it. On the Other hand, if they have a serious reason for wanting to leave, the should definetly be allowed to do so. Some LEGIT reasons include, but are not limited to: abuse, neglect, unloved, etc. That's why kids should be able to leave their parents. LEGIT!!!!
ReplyDeleteI think that children should not be able to deviorce their parents because what if they love eachother very much but they are not acting nice to one another. When someone wants to hurt or abuse kids its a bad behavior not a normal behavior but a sicknesss in someones mind. You should first be able to seek help from an expert. You should try to treat the sickness instead of running away because you can get some of the authortites to help you out with it. Even if you have to spend time away form your parents, you should always try to help and understand that they really love you. It is their sickness that makes them act bad. With much love and understanding, and help from experts in the feild of abuse or neglect, you might be able to over come some bad times.
ReplyDeleteI honestly think that in a situation like this a child should have the right to "divorce" their parent(s), but they should stay home unless their parent(s) is abusive or threatens them.They should be able to live in a safe enviornment were the child can trust their parent(s),I think children should not be leaving home at the age of 9.Children need parents to live until they are able to go off on their own. If a child decides to go off on their own that is their disission but i think they should be at least the age of 16.I dont recommend that kids leave at the age of 16 but i say kids stay at home until they are at the point they are ready to leave home. If things are bad at home like their parent(s) are being abusive then they should be able to leave home.I say that children should be able to divorce their parent(s).
ReplyDeleteYea dude i definitely think that kids should have the right to divorce their parents. One reason I say this is because if a kid is being abused and not treated right then they should be able to leave at whatever age they want and nobody would be able to stop them. Another reason kids should be able to divorce their parents is if the kids family cannot support him/her then the kid cannot live. In a way I also don't think that kids should be able to leave their parents because they would have no place to go and nothing to live on. Another reason not to let kids divorce their parents is that their parents is that he kids parents would be devastated by their decision to leave and i don think anyone wants to see their parents sad don't you agree? These are the reasons i agree and don't agree with letting kids divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteA child absolutely should not be allowed to divorce a parent or want to be legally separated from them. This is because kids at a young age get angry about the littlest of things. There not mature enough to make these decisions. Therefore, if they ever get angry with a parent, (which happens frequently in most cases), that child could make the regret of never seeing their parent again. Besides, all kids need their parents at one point or another in their lifetime. For example, you need your parent’s signatures on many things like school forms for the approval signature on field trips or for getting a license, and much more. In addition, your parents would do anything for you to try and keep you happy and safe. There just doing their job, so why would we repay them by divorcing them or wanting to be separated from them. There are millions of orphans in the world who only want to find their parents. So is it really fair that you would be allowed to choose your parents when these kids only wish for one to come and adopt them? No, a child should not be allowed to divorce or legally want to be separated from them.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should be able to "divorce" from their parent(s). However I believe that there should be an age restriction of having to be 16 years old. Also there should be a group of adults that receive the request. After it has been read and has a legitimate reason such as physical abuse or unloving parents, the committee would decide whether or not the requester is allowed to legally "divorce" from their parent(s). This prevents several problems that may occur. It prevents young children from "divorcing" because of small problems like not getting something they wanted. Also 16 year olds are more self-sufficient. They usually have a small time job and a drivers license. As long as the person requesting to be divorced from their parents is 16, I say it should be allowed.
ReplyDeleteI think that you should be able to divorce you parents. However, only if you have a real reason for it, such as you are being abused. Just because you don’t like your mom and dad or you are mad at them doesn’t mean you should be able to get a divorce with them. If a child is being abused and nothing can stop that other than the child getting a divorce with their parents then a child should be able to get divorced with them. It is unfair for the child to go through such terrible things and if a divorce would take care of that, it should be allowed. This connects to class because we talked about how everyone is born with “natural rights” life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If a child is being abused them I’m sure they are not happy, and if they could pursue happiness by getting a divorce with their parents with good reasons I think they should be allowed. Even though I do believe kids should be able to get a divorce with their parents I feel that unless it is a serious case kids should have to wait until they are at least 16 when they are more mature to make the decision. If parents and their kids can get help to work things out rather than getting a divorce I think that would be better except for when the safety of the child is at risk. That’s why I think children should be able to divorce their parents with good reason.
ReplyDeleteYes, I do think a child should have a right to divorce a parent. I think this because if the child is being treated badly, for example, being abused, not being able to get enough sleep, or being provided with the simple things every child needs. Every child was born with the same natural right as every adult was, so why shouldn't the child be allowed to divorce a parent? Children have feelings too! I also do not think that a child should have a right to divorce a parent, if they aren't at a certain age when they are trusted to tell the truth. What I mean by this is that if a child is mad at their parent, and divorce them- and realize how they made a bad change in their life later, they might regret it. People make crazy choices when they are mad and realize that it wasn't the right choice later, and regret it. For example, some kids want to get away from their parents because they won't let them get the new iPod they want. But after they realize that they shouldn't have gotten so mad, they feel sorry for the other person because of how they treated them. Once the child is around the ages 12 or 13, they will be more likely to have an easier time convincing people than when they were younger than age 10. This is why I do and do not think that children should have a right to divorce a parent.
ReplyDeleteI believe that children obtain the right to divorce their parents if they feel in anyway neglected or abused. But there should be restrictions on age of the child and motive for the divorce. In my opinion children should be at least a teenager to divorce from their parents. This ensures that they are mature enough to make a knowledgeable decision. Also this will make sure that the kids are independent enough to cope with the struggles they would go through after divorcing with their parents. In addition to an age limit the child must also have a legitimate reason to divorce such as physical abuse, neglect, or other situations when the child’s safety or wellbeing is at risk. These are valid causes for a child to want to divorce from their parents. However, wanting to divorce because you are not getting want you want or you don’t agree with your parents aren’t sufficient motives. If kids are allowed to divorce from their parents it will ensure the safety of many kids who are being mistreated. They would be taken into custody and into foster care where they would hopefully find a loving family. All child/parent divorce cases should be taken to court where the judge or jury will deem if the case is appropriate for divorce. Why should this be disallowed if it protects the child? This relates to our class because we learned about people’s natural rights. Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In the situation that a child feels that their natural rights are being violated they should have the right to divorce from their parents. This is just like how people have the right to change their government if it doesn’t protect their natural rights. This is why kids should have the right to divorce from one of or both of their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think that the kids have a right to divorce a parent. I think that the kids have a right to divorce the parent because if the parent is beating the child and going after them at something that you shouldn't go after. I think that the kids have a right to not divorce a parent because the child hasn't learned how to survive in the world and without their parents to guide them to the right direction in life the kids won't understand what or where they are in the world. When the kids decide that they want to divorce the parents the parents will think are you making the right descisons because you don't know what the outside world is like? I think that the kid will have a tough time choosing between divorcing a parent and staying with them because the parents may do something really nice for the kids but at the same time the kid may be angry at their parents for not letting them do what they want. Parents are trying to figure out what or how are you going to make it in this world and will you survive in the world?
ReplyDeleteI think that kids should have the right to divorce a parent if they think it will affect their future life. Like if you had an abusive father or mother, you should be able to do something about it.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that kids should be able to say that they want to divorce their parents if their parents told them to clean their room.
I think that this is a good idea but it should be tried in a court of law. The only problem with this is the fact that this would be expensive. There should be some kind of financial aid for kids.
Children are often irrational and dramatic. If a child decided their parent was bad just because they wouldn't be allowed desert would not be good. On the other hand if a parent actually was being abusive or unresponsive then the child should have a choose. If the child was to divorce a parent then it would have to be a long drawn out legal process. Then, afterward, the child would have to be placed with another guardian, because they couldn't just have the child wander around all alone with no protection or money. Overall I believe it would be a bad idea because the whole process would be very complicated. We are born to our parents and are one of the few things we cannot change and we must put up with them. Though, as said in class, if there is a ruler or form of government that we deem unfair we can and should take care of it, and the same goes with parents
ReplyDeleteI think that kids shounld not divorce only when they your parents hurt to and give you black in blues. When you divorce the parent that means they hurt you to. I think that the kids have a right to not divorce a parent because the child hasn't learned to survive in the world. In addition to an age limit the child must also have a legitimate reason to divorce such as abuse when the child’s safety.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should have a right to divorice a parent if they had a good reason. For example, a child couldn't divorice a parent for a stupid reason like, "Mom won't buy me a cookie. I'll divorice her!" That would be just unreasonable. But there could be some good reasons. For example, if they are gettin abused. Also, if they are neglected. But, I also think the parent should have a say. For example, there would be an agreement. If the parent promised to change, than the kid couldn't divorice. I think this would be a good idea because divoricing your parents is a big change. Also, if the parent does not even make an effort to change, then the kid could divorice. The kid would have to have a place to go that's not their parents house. It would have to be a good home. In the end, I think a kid should be able to divorice his parents, but with restrictions.
ReplyDeleteI believe that children should have the right to "divorce" a parent if they feel threatened or abused. For example, if a parent is beating a kid with a stick, the kid has the right to "divorce" the parents because he needs to feel safe around them. If the parents are not feeding the child or giving the child daily needs, then the parent is irresponsible and shows that he or she cant take care of a child. I also believe that the child should have proof. Some little kids hate their parents if they even take away their desert because they were bad in some way. The kid would think they were mean and would want to go to nicer parents. The parents are only teaching the kid a lesson because he was bad. I think that the kids should also have proof if "divorcing" a parent. I can connect this to class because in Social Studies, we are learning about America breaking away from Britain. The colonists felt abused with all the taxes and threatened with all the British soldiers walking around. They fought until they broke away from Britain because of this. This is why kids should be able to divorce from parents.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should not be able to divorce a parent because one parent might not be so nice to the child and the child could hate the parent but it still dosent mean that the parent loves you. Most of the time a child thinks that their parents should or might divorce because there yelling at eachother but maybe their just having an argument about work or something it really dosent mean that the parents need to divorce maybe they just need a day off from stress and need to vent so no I dont think children should have the right to divorce a parent.
ReplyDeleteI believe that children should have the right to " divorce their parents." I think this because if a child is getting seriously hurt or neglected by a parent then they have a right to state their problem and do something about it. Kids are born with natural rights and have the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, thus happiness. If a child is not safe or happy in any environment, that should immediately change. They deserve to get the nurturing and loving a parent is supposed to give. However, if a child should become irrational about a situation and want to leave their parents for minor purposes such as not letting him/her to get a toy, then, the process should not be granted or completed. Unless, there is a major problem, I believe kids should have to wait until they are at least 14 or 15. At this age kids are becoming more mature and aware of the situation, and are willing to take charge properly, assuring they are making a knowledgeable decision. This will allow kids to have a sense of independence, but at the same time will teach them an extremely important life lesson. This would teach them to be able to handle the struggles one might have to face throughout life. In a situation like this, kids and parental guardians will have to go through a process, which will be well worth it because in the end a child will end up with a new, loving family. Having the love of a family is the most important thing a child needs to have in order to have support and wholesomeness in their life. It will give kids a second chance of being cared for the proper way and I promise they will cherish it forever. This connects to our class because we were taught that everyone if born with natural rights, "Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness," which are stated above. Kids should change their state or being by taking charge to find a better family. This is just like how with the government, if they don't like something, they have the right to speak their mind and vote for a change. So really your "natural rights" are in every part of your life, and are completely essential. This is why a kid should have the right to "divorce" their parents and a connection to class.
ReplyDeleteIn my point of view, I think that divorcing your parents isn't the best idea. In my perspective, I believe that if you do divorce your parents you may regret it in the future. If you divorced them when you were mad at them, you probably thought that was a great idea. Then you'll realize that you miss having both of them around. You'll start missing them and start wondering if divorcing your parents was the right choice. I know of people who wished their parents got divorced because they thought they would get double the presents on their birthdays and on Christmas. When their parents actually got divorced they realized it wasn't as fun as they imagined. They missed doing things together and even the little arguments they got in. In this way, I think kids shouldn't have the ability to divorce their parents. On the other hand, if your parents are always fighting, abusing, and ignoring you all the time, my opinion changes. If this happens to you, you should be allowed to report it and divorce your parents. If this kind of responsibility is put into our hands, I think there should be and age requirement. The most reasonable age would be fifteen. This may seem a bit old, but by then you will have lived with them a long time and be able to witness whether the situation has stayed the same or improved. It will also give you time to make a decision. When you are about twelve or thirteen, it's possible to make a decision without thinking about it all the way through and thinking about all the consequences of your actions. If your parents make your life miserable by fighting all the time and having them abuse you, you should have the right to divorce them! The only thing is that you can't divorce them for a dumb reason and there should be an age requirement of fifteen.
ReplyDeleteThis is a question who's answer varies with the situation. If the child is being abused, malnourished, or even malested then absolutely! But, on the other hand, they can't divorce their parents because they won't by them Skyrim: The Elder Scrolls. Besides, it's people's jobs to make sure your parents don't do that stuff. The children should atleast be able to report to the law. So, in the end, kids should not be able to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteBless your face!
Peace off!
I believe kids should be able to "divorce" their parents under certain conditions. I believe the child should have to tell someone about it and have that witness file a report. There should be a minimum age of 12. Also, there has to be a legitimate reason for this though, if a parent has taken away their Facebook, or grounded them for 2 weeks, is not a legitimate reason to "divorce". However, if their is a case of child abuse, neglect, or unfit living conditions, then child services should be brought in, and the child should be allowed to "divorce" their parent. This is different from two adults who are married and have filed for divorce because they don't exactly need a supported reason to divorce, if a spouse wants to divorce, then they can. If a child wants to leave their current family, then they DO need a reason because they are considered minors. They are similar because you are breaking away from someone else. This also reminds me of when we learned about the American colonists breaking away from Britain because of the taxes they were constantly imposing on them without consent. This relates to divorcing a parent because if a child feels their home is unfit for growing up in, for a good reason, then they can "break away" from their parents, like how the colonists broke away from the British. This is why i think that kids should be able to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think that children should have the right to divorce their parents. All though, there would have to be rules about under what circumstances children can do this. For example, a kid would not be able to leave their parents for any reasons that doesn’t endanger their well being or natural rights. If a child wanted to get divorced from their parents they couldn’t say, “My dad didn’t buy me buy a bag of peanuts for my birthday, so I am going to divorce my parents.” or any other unserious reasons. However, the child would be able to get a divorce from their parents if they committed something such as abuse, unpaid/forced labor, neglect, etc. The parent and child would have to have a court trial to approve of this though. I also think that there would have to be rules on the age of the child wishing to file for divorce from their parents. If the child is younger than thirteen years old, they should not be able to get a divorce from their parents. To add to this, social services would have to find a suitable home for the child who gets separated from their parents. So, overall, as most people said in answer to this blog, I think that under certain circumstances children should have the right to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think that children should be able to divorce their parents or parent. This should only be if the child has a logical reason for why they would want to divorce their parent(s). This means that they shouldn't be able to divorce their parent(s) for silly, unimportant reasons, like my parent(s) wouldn't let me stay up late, or my parent(s) took something away from me. Reasons should be more important and things that really affect them in a negative way on a regular basis. This would include things like my parent(s) is a drug addict and abuses me, or my parent(s) is violent and hurts me on a regular basis, or even, my parent(s) doesn't provide for me(clothes, food, ect..). Also, the child that wants the divorce should be a certain age or over. This age should probably be around 13 years old. This would help to insure that the child is mature enough to make the decision and to live with the consequences that may follow. This reminds me of how the colonists were trying to break free of England and start their own country and government. In their own way, the colonists are kind of "divorcing" England. Colonists had reasonable reasons of why they wanted this to be done. One was that England was taxing the colonists without including the colonists on that decision. Also, England and its soldiers were "abusing" colonists, especially in the Boston Massacre, when the British soldiers killed 5 colonists and injured others as well. This is why I think that children should be able to "divorce" a parent(s).
ReplyDeleteI believe that children should be able to divorce their parents. But, only if the have a legititment reason for doing so. If the child if being abused, malested, or hurt in some way than of course they should be able to. All reasonible parents want the best for their children. If a divorce is what it talks to do that than so be it. On the contrary, if their reason for divorcing their parents is,"Mom wouldn't let me go to the movies" than of course not. The only reason for breaking up a marriage is if someone is being affected negatively in some way. This connects to when the colonies wanted to break away from Britian. In a way they were having a divorce much like this situtuion. So I believe children have the right to divorce their parents with a good reason.
ReplyDeleteI think that Children should have the right to divorce a parent under certain circumstances. These circumstances would be: If the child is being neglected on the terms of not having any attention directed towards them. Also If the child is being physically abused by their parents they should have the right to divorce their parents. In this case the child protective services would most likely get involved. When this is occurring serious damage can be done to a child that isn’t just physical. A surprisingly high percentage of children whom are abused at a young age grow up to abuse their own children and this just keeps repeating. Also when a child is abused it does serious damage to the child’s self esteem and it could also make their home a scary place to be. If the child was able to divorce the parent maybe this wouldn’t have happened...
ReplyDeleteIf a child is mad at a parent for grounding them they shouldn’t have the right to divorce a parent just because they are mad at that one point in time. I say this because in almost in 99.99% of the times this happens the parent is shortly forgiven. It may seem like they hate you when they don’t let you go to your friends house but they always love you they are just doing what’s best for you.
Something that should should also be important is the age that this should be allowed at. The child should be at a mature stage in their life so that if they were to do this they would be able to make a knowledgeable decision about what they are getting themselves into. I think a good age would be 16 because hopefully all children are mature enough to get help if they are actually getting abused by their parents. I think this is definitely some thing that should be looked into a little more and I would like to see what happens to this idea. Good night.
I really, really, really, think that a child should not be ale to divorce a parent, because , technically, the child is property of the parents and can only be released, (can do what ever they want under state law) at the age of 18 only. The only reason a child should be able t get taken away from their parent(s) is if the government is aware that they are being abused. Why would a kid even want to be away from there wonderful parents? Anyway, a child should not have a say in that for (1) safety reasons. Your parents could hurt you in a way because they are crazy. Isn’t that the only reason there is? I mean, the government will eventually find out. (2) There can be a lot of false statement and what if the only reason they want to file a divorce is because they just think that the parent(s) are just being plane mean by having rules witch let them ether do, on not do something. There is NO point to even start on this, because the child, sometimes, won’t even get past the social workers! And there you have it… I think that a child should NOT be able to file a divorce.
ReplyDeletei don't think that kids should be able to divorce their parent.that is because that kids can't just leave parents for no reason or if they get yelled at.it's their parent and they can do what ever they want you to do.deal with it!when they're 18 they do what ever they want.it is not that long. plus, if they divorce their parent, they would have to live on their own.that means that they have to make money to live, and lets say if a kid divorce their parents when he is 13, he would have to work and go to school.that is a lot of work for a 13 years old kid.
ReplyDeleteI think kids should have the right to divorce their parents depending on the reason. If a kid does not feel loved, not getting the right attention, cant trust their parent(s) or is hurt phiysically or emoitionally by a parent then they should have the right to. If the kid wants to divorce their parent because the got grounded or made them clean their room. If a kid is afriad of their parents or their is a major problem at home between parents and kids, it could effect their grades, thier health etc.
ReplyDeleteIf a kid doesnt feel safe, than they should absolutly be consisdered to be given the possiblility of divorcig their parents. I can relate to this, because one of my friends was abused by her dad. He would do bad things like drag her by her hair, beat her and say/do mean inapropriat thing to her. She told her mom about what her dad did when she wasnt around and the parents got in a divorce for the safty or the kids. So I agree for the safty of kids everywhere, kids should be given this right.
I think a child should be able to divorce his own parents but he needs to be a teenager. Why I say this is because the kid needs to be independent becuase he/she won't be able to make their own choices by them selves if their not independent. This is why i think kids can divorce there parents
ReplyDeleteYes, a child should have the right to "divorce" a parent. Though I think this, there should be a minimum age for a child to be able to do this. A child should be over 18 in order to follow through with an official divorce because at this age, they are now old enough to make correct decisions on their own. No child should be able to have a divorce from their parent under this age because their mind is still growing and not ready to make life changing decisions. They may have an argument with their parent over something silly such as their parent will not let them go to a party for Halloween. The child may think this parent is neglecting them by not permitting them to go, when in real life, this decision that the parent is making can benefit the child and might be the right think to do. Aside from the age limit, a child must have a reason to file for this divorce. For example if a child is being abused and the well-being of this child is at risk. In the case this child does have a legitimate reason want a divorce, this case should be taken seriously in a court in front or a judge. When or if the child is successful and the divorce stands, a child will be moved to a foster home where he or she will eventually find a caring family to take them in. By not being able to divorce our parents, this limits our natural right of pursuit of happiness.
ReplyDeleteOh... I forgot my connection. I can relate this to when the colonist were trying to separate from England. They were trying to, “divorce” them for a not-so-good reason. But, the colonists should not be ab e to considering that they are property of England.
ReplyDeletei believe that they should have the right. but there has to be a good reason for the divorce. a child cannot just go divorceing a parent because they wont get them something, they wont let them have a freind over, etc. 2 reasons are A) they are harming the child. or B) they are harming the other parental figure
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should have the right to divorce their parents, but under certain circumstances. If the child gets grounded and decides they want to divorce their parents because they are mad at them, then I don't think that should be considered a reason for a divorce. There should always be a good reason for wanting this. I say that because the child is mad when he or she gets grounded and they are so mad that they can't think clearly, so I don't think that the child should be allowed a divorce from their parents for grounding them. But if the circumstance is that the child is being physically abused by their parent, child protective services would get involved and the child should have a right to a divorce. I also think that there should be a minimum of 13 years of age if you want to divorce your parents.So then you are more mature and able to think about what you really want. This relates to adults divorcing each other because, usually, when people divorce, it's because there is something wrong in their relationship, and it is the same with kids and their parents, if there is something wrong, kids should have a right to divorce. This reminds me of when the colonists were trying to "break away" from England and trying to become independent with their government, so in a way, they were sort of divorcing England because there was something wrong with their relationship. The colonists had good reasons for divorcing England, like England taxing them without their consent. So I believe that children should have a right to divorce their parents if they have good reasons.
ReplyDeleteI believe a child should have a right in divorcing a parent, but only if they have an appropriate reason to. I say this because if a child is physically, or emotionally, hurt by their parent, they should immediately contact someone, because it is a criminal offense. Furthermore, children should have a right in stating their opinions. It is our first amendment. However, if the child wants to divorce a parent because they didn’t get what they want or some other inappropriate statement, the child shouldn’t be able to divorce a parent. This is because a parent shouldn’t have to “pay the price” for asserting adult authority. I always get into fights with my parents to the point where I’m so angry I don’t want to talk to them anymore, of course that doesn’t last long. This doesn’t give me the right to “divorce” them. However, if my parents have physically hurt me at one point and have a record of doing hurting me, I absolutely have the right to tell another adult. This shows that a child does have the right in divorcing a parent.
ReplyDeleteNo i don't think that they should have the right to divorce a parent. This is because it's not the child's business. First of all the parents do witness everything that happens. Also the parents may feel differently. If this was allowed it would be chaos in the world. This is because everyone would protest about this idea. This is like the Colonists and England. This is because England was trying to divorce each other so they could be free from England and not have to follow their orders.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should have the right to divorce there parents, but under certain circumstances. If the child is being physically abused or hurt in some way then this is definitely a reason to divorce from you parents. If their reason for divorce is because they got grounded or couldn't go somewhere they wanted then this is not a reason for a divorce. I also think that there needs to be a minimum age to decide whether or not you want to divorce your parents. This age should be 13, I say this because at the age of 13 you are able to think things through before making a huge decision like divorcing your parents. The only reason to divorce from someone if is someone is being hurt in a negative way. This relates to Social Studies because the colonists were trying to get away from England. This is like divorcing your parents because the colonists had a negative "relationship" with England and wanted to become independent with their government and break free of their control. So yes i think that children should have the right to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI believe that children should have the right to divorce their parent(s). I also believe that there should be an age requirement. Children should at least be 13 to be able to divorce one or both of their parents. If a child is this age then she/he is old enough to make a mature, knowledgeable desicion about what they want and what is best for them. Also if children are this age then they are old enough to understand what it is they are deciding to do, and they will be able to cope with the emotional side of the situation. However I believe that the child should need to have a legitimate reason for the divorce. Children should not be allowed to divorce their parents because they didn't get the latest toy, or they got in trouble for not doing their chores. They should have a serious reason like, abuse, malnutrition, or sexual abuse. When a child is in a situation like these they should absolutely be able to get out and go to a safe environment. This relates to our class because we talked about people's natural rights. People have 3 natural rights, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Being in a home where you are being abused is not only mentally and physically damaging but it takes away your natural rights. If a child was in a critical condition then I can promise you they aren't happy and they don't have the chance to have a pursuit of happiness. Giving them the option to divorce their parents and move to a safe environment would give them some of these rights back.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget connections!
ReplyDeleteKids who have bad parents sometimes feel neglected, abused, and overwhelmed. The question then is should we allow kids to divorce their parents? I believe that we should allow minors to divorce their parents under circumstances. For one, the child has to be at least a teenager to make a complaint to authorities to be removed from their parents. This is because some kids might call the authorities for something immature like their parents not buying a video game, or even grounding them. Second, there has to be signs of abuse or neglect. I once knew this kid who called the cops on his dad for smacking and beating him up even though there were no signs of abuse. Later on, the cops found out that he called them because he was mad that his dad wouldn't buy cigarettes for him. This relates to the colonists and England because the English people neglected the colonists, and when they did pay attention, they either forced the colonists to do something, pay taxes, or both. England also abused the colonies in many ways such as the Boston Massacre.
ReplyDeleteI think children over a certain age should be able to "divorce" their parent or other legal guardian. If a child repeatedly feels like living with the parent is hurtful to their welfare, education, relationships or otherwise, and are at least 13, I think they should be able to file for separation from that parent, or parents. Just like a marital divorce, both involved parties (parents and child) should be required to fill out some forms and agree to certain rules about their separation.
ReplyDeleteThe reason I think that kids who want a divorce from their parents should be at least 13, unless in the case of serious abuse or sexual harassment, is that by the time a child is 13, they will most likely be able to responsibly and maturely judge their relationship with their parent. For example, an 8-year-old child would most likely not be able to judge their relationship with their parents and the seriousness of a "divorce" well enough. However, past age 13 children are more likely to understand how serious a divorce would be and that being grounded isn't a reason to divorce your parents. They also are more likely to see the effects of bad parenting on their lives, or, for example, more likely to see the effects of having a drug-addicted parent.
However, if the child is being starved, beaten, sexually harassed, or otherwise abused, there should be immediate action. It wouldn't make sense to make a child live with an extremely abusive parent until they are 13 so that they can make a choice. I think in serious cases, children should be able to get help as soon as possible.
I can connect the decision to "divorce" a parent with the American Revolution in social studies. In both this example and with the British vs the Colonists, their is an oppressed party and an oppressive, ruling party. In this example, children who are being badly affected by their parents are choosing to separate from their parents. In Social Studies, the Colonists who were being disrespected and badly treated by the British are choosing to break free from British rule and become independent.
I think a child should be able to divorce their parents as long as they have a good reason. A child shouldn't be able to divorce there parents because they wont get them Modern Warfare 3. But, if the child has a good reason then they should have the ability to divorce their parents. An example is if their parents are abusive and its not a safe enviorment for the child to live in then the child should have the right to divorce the parents for their safety
ReplyDeleteI think a child should be able to divorce a parent if there is a legitimist reason and their life is at risk. For example is children are abused by a parent and their life is at risk then they should definitely be able to legally not belong to that person. On the other hand kids shouldn’t be able to divorce their parent just so they can have their own rules or they get in one fight. Also I think if you could divorce a parent for any reason then I think kids would use the threat that they were going to divorce them if they didn’t get their way. In a way I think that the way America is currently using with being able to decide whether or not the child has to be with a parent works well like my idea of how it should happen. For example if you get abused at home you can go to the law and they will take care of it but you can’t go off on your own until you are 18 and considered an adult meaning you can’t leave your parents until you are old and responsible enough to take care of yourself.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child shouldn’t be able to divorce a parent. I feel this way because yes some people might say that if a parent is abusive, neglects their child, or whatever else like doesn’t feed them they should be able to divorce there parent but if a parent is like that a lot of the time the kid gets taken away by dcf anyway. Kids need their parents to love them and care for them and no one will ever love you as much as them (well in some cases may be like if your parent it abusive or unstable). I have friends who have been adopted and some of them feel like even though there mom is there mom they will never be there mother meaning they can’t feel that special connection that kids need. My aunt and uncle use to foster kids before they had any and those kids are the ones with really hard lives like their parents left them or they got taken away by dcf. If kids divorce there parents because they think they are mean they will never really have real parents and maybe just foster families. Sometimes I think my parents are mean and I wish I had different ones but when it comes down to it I don’t think I could find better parents ones that wouldn’t kill me because I’m so annoying and give them a major attitude. Personally if I could divorce my parents I probably would have then I would be really un happy right now because I miss them and I couldn’t connect with anyone else that adopted me or whatever. I think that kids shouldn’t be able to divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should be able to divore a parent. There are so many reasons why they should. For example, there could be abuse involved with this relationship.There are laws and kids today can not do this so back then it would make sense to have a divorce in this case. I just wouldn't understand why a kid would want to marry an adult.Any ways kids should not have the same rights as a parent. The parent normally has more power than the kid. Thats almost like an adult and there own kid. Also back then there was no real police so basically you can get away with anything. Back then you would own your certain things and that would be yours and whatever you wanted to do you could do basically. But there were also some laws that were needed to be followed. I dont see why a kid would want to go out with an adult though.
ReplyDeleteYes, I think children should have the right to divorce their parents/ parent. I think that because if a child is being neglected and abused, the parents obviously aren’t going to turn themselves in, so what choice do children have? Just to sit there and endure the constant pain and agony? They should be able to stand up for themselves in times of need, which is exactly what this right provides. However, kids shouldn’t just be able to divorce their parents for some ridiculous reason. It would have to be taken in a court case and the kids should be held custody until the verdict is decided so they don’t have to go back home with their cruel parents. This connects to a story I heard a couple of weeks ago about a sixteen year old that was neglected by his parents. They starved him, and when the cops found the child he was only thirty four pounds. Thirty four pounds is a terrifyingly small weight for a teenager. Also, the story claimed that he didn’t even know how to talk because he had never been to school and his brain was permanently messed up due to malnourishment. This just goes to show how bad neglection can get, and if kids don’t have the right to take themselves away from the terrible lives, they may end up like this unfortunate teen did. Who would want to live in a world where kids have to go through these terrible times? I don’t think anyone in their right mind would. Therefore, kids should have the right to divorce from their parents if the reason is legitiment.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce their parents. If the kid is just mad at them, they should not be able to. But if they have a real reason, like their parents are abusive, I think they should be able to divorce them. Bad things could come from doing this, like not having someone to take care of you or a place to sleep. A kid should only be able to divorce a parent if the parent is really abusive. Doing this keeps kids from being able to divorce their parents just because they are mad at them for something. That way, only kids who really need to be taken out of their parent's care can divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce a parent legally if there the situation is serious enough. For example, if a parent is abusing a child in a sort of way such as beating them in a serious enough matter or putting their life at risk they should have the right to divorce them. The child could be in a serious amount of danger and the situation would be very serious. But if a parent wouldn’t buy them a video game they should not be able to. The parent wouldn’t be doing anything that bad to the child. When the colonist was divorcing the English they had a good reason to. The English were unfair to them, such as not letting them trade with the rest of the world, taxing them on virtually anything they could and much more. This would be a good reason to divorce because the English were abusing the colonies and just making money off of them. This is why I think a child should be able to divorce a parent.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should be able to "divorce" a parent. But there should be some requirements. The child must be the age of 13 and have good reasons to "divorce" their parent(s). I believe they must have proof to back up there reasons. If the child is the age 13 and has good enough reasons and can back them up then the child should be able to divorce his or her parent(s). For an example if i child wanted to divorce her mom because she took away her cell phone then it wouldn't make sense to allow her to divorce her parent. But if the parent beated the son or daughter and the child had proof then the child should definitely be able to divorce his or her parent. Because all around the world kids get beat up from their parents and cannot do anything. But if you could divorce you're parents this could be a whole new chance for children!
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce their parent(s). I think this because if there parent is doing something to the child like abusing him or her, it can cause the child to not want to be with them. Even though you wouldn't have a place to sleep it's better than being with a parent that doesn't treat you like a human being. It can also hurt the child because it can ruin their reputation or education. I think that a child would rather want to get A's than F's. If you left it would be a lot easier to focus on school. If you were with an abusing parent you would probably stay crying all night
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should have the right to divorce their parents. Sometimes kids get very angry with their parents and absolutly hate them. Most kids feel the same way, but they should't really divorce their parents because of everything their parents do for them like for example Christmas, who would give you all the presents. Another reason children shouldn't divorce their parents is because they would have no where to live. But they do have reasons to divorce them like child abuse but thats about it. Children would't be able to do half thew stuff they do without their parents.
ReplyDeleteI personally think that children should have the right to divorce their parents, but only in the case in which they have a serious reason to. I think that children should have the right to divorce their parents because there could be a predicament going on in the household that would make the child want to get away from the parents. For example, in most households there is child abuse which most of the time gets the DCF involved. If the child’s life is at risk they should divorce the parent as soon as possible only for their safety.
ReplyDeleteA connection would be kids that are in foster care. Most of the kids that are in the foster care are coming from households that are abused. Those kids had the right to divorce their parents because of the experience that they were having. This is why kids should have the right to divorce their parents, but only if they have the right reason to.
Yes, I think it's a right for a child to divorce a parent because if a child is being harmed by a parents or something then that child is in danger. And what we want best is that child is to be in good shape and have loving parents that won't hurt the child. an the child is having loving parents who care about him/her. It should be a law that kids should divorce There parents if they are being harmed or being hurt by them. And I have a sense that kids today are still being harmed by their parents. And I had bet that those kids had to divorce their parents and find a new loving home that the parents won't hurt them they will be kind and nice and treat them with respect. That is whybi think kids should divorce their parents.
ReplyDeleteI think that kids should have a right to divorce their parents. But, it would have to be under some drastic circumstances. Like, getting neglected, being abused, and more. You can't just get really mad at them and say you want them to divorce. Only the kids that need to be taken out of their homes could divorce their parents. Not any child that gets mad at their parents could divorce their parents. Or else they will not have a home and have to go into a foster home. If any kid divorce their parents then a lot of kids would just get mad at them once and divorce them so, they would have to be under certain circumstances.
ReplyDeleteI think that kids should be allowed to divorce parents for reasonable matters. A kid couldn’t just go up to their parent/parents and say they want a divorce for no reason. A child should only divorce a parent for reasons like child abuse, drug problems, and/or if the parent has been involved in a major crime or crimes. Though, if a child is divorcing their parent/parents, it should be like if a person was divorcing their wife/husband, they should fill out divorce papers. I can connect this to our social studies class because the British were like the parents of the colonists who were the children. The colonists needed to separate from the British because they were imposing taxes on them, damaging their economy so, the colonists pretty much divorced from the British. This is similar to what I am saying about the children and their parent/parents. Personally, I would never divorce my parents but as Americans, we have a say about our lives, even if we are children. Therefore, children should be allowed to divorce their parent/parents.
ReplyDeleteI think a child should be able to divorce their parents, but only if they have an honest reason for doing so. Otherwise they might make a rash decision and later on regret it. Not just if the child Is mad at the parent for some inadequate reason such as if the parent didn't get them something they wanted. I think a child should only be able to divorce their parents if They aren't providing a sufficient environment for a child, and has to get an ok from a government official to divorce them.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce there parents only if they have a really good reason to. If a child gets abused or feels threaten and unsafe in their house they should have the right to divorce there parents. But if the child wants to divorce their parents because they wont let them do something then i dont think they should be given the right. Pretty much every kid hates their parents at one point, and if they were to divorce their parents for that reason then they would mosat likely regret and they really couldnt go back.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child can only divorce his parents when one of the parents are abbusive. On the other hand kids shouldn't have the complete choice of when thier parents divorce. If cildren had the complete choice of whether thier parents got a divorce then every time a kid got mad they'd divorce the parent that made them mad. But we dont want thier to be an abusive parent in the relation ship so in that case a cild could ishue a divorce, if there were a reason for anyone to believe there were an abusive relationship going on then a kid could divorce thier parents.
ReplyDeleteA child should be able to divorce their parents. Lets say a child is abused or scared to be living with their own parents then obviously they shouldn't have to live with the people. Some parents aren't even ready to be parents so if a child feels mistreated then they could divorce their parents. I don't believe in child abuse and sometimes children are afraid to speak out against their parents, so their stuck with them. They should be able to leave and go to a better family by choice. Only if they really have to though.
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce their parents. This is because the parents set a road in life for their child he or she may not feel comfortable in the house. Also short tempered parents may physically or mentally abuse the child. This will cause the child to grow up and do that because they this that it is the right thing. This could led to more and more abusive parents. Now, this rule is only allowed to be used if there is really a major problem. If a kid wants to divorce their parents because they wont let them go to the latest party it isn't needed. But, the child must feel comfortable with moving to a different family. This is why children should be able to but they have to do it for the right type of thing.
ReplyDeleteno children should have the right to be allowed to devoirce. One reason is because is they are abuse or the parents beat them and fight a lot. Another reason is because if they are mistreated by the parents. Lastly is they should be allowed to change to a nicer family.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutly not! Children should not have the right to divorce a parent. They should not be able to because if you think about without your parents you would not have anything to vare for you like your parents. Another reason a kid should not be able to divorce a parent beacuse although the parents may be abussive or neglect their children it is the parents right to get a divorce or not. That is why children should not have the right to divorce their parents or paren
ReplyDeleteI think kids should have the right to divorce a parent. if a child is being abused by a parent, that child should have the right to ask for a divorce between his or her parents. a divorce for safety reasons is one thing, but if a child just tries to divorce his or her parents for no reason, the parents should have a form of vito power. however, children already have a small say in their parents divorces. for example, if a child asked his parents to get a divorce and had solid grounds, the parents would take it into account. so, children already have the right to divorce their parents, but should not have any more say, because children don't necessarily have good judgement, and they may divorce their parents, then regret it, but divorces are permanent
ReplyDeleteI think that a child should be able to divorce there parents but if they have a really good reason too. for example if a child gets abused or feels unsafe with their parents they should be able to divorce their parents. on the flip side if the child wants to divorce their parents because they wont let them do something or have something i dont think they should be able to divorse their parents.
ReplyDelete